Supreme Court of India
Ayya Alias Ayub v. State of U.P. & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is allowed, the order of detention impugned in the petition quashed and the petitioner is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless he is held in custody pursuant to any other order under any lawful authority.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
Constitution of India, 1950: Article 21-Personal liberty Greatest of human freedoms-Preventive detention laws-To be strictly construed-Procedural safeguards-Meticulous compliance to be insisted upon. National Security Act, 1980: Sections 3 and 5-detention order- Subjective satisfaction of detaining authority-Necessity for-What would be a simple 'law and order' situation may assume gravity and mischief of 'public order' problem. c Statutory Interpretation: Preventive Detention laws to be strictly construed-meticulous compliance with procedural safeguards to be insisted upon. The
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2013 Subhash Popatlal Dave v. Union of India & Anr.
- 2012 Huidrom Konungjao Singh v. State of Manipur & Ors.
Of those, 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.