Supreme Court of India
State of U.P. v. Krishna Gopal & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
8 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Constitution of India 1950: Article 136-Supreme Court does not interfere with findings of fact reached by High Court unless vitiated by serious errors. The respondents were put on trial for offences under section 302 read with section 34, IPC. At the trial the prosecution mainly relied on the eye-witnesses and the statement of the deceased recorded by the Investigating Officer, which was sought to be used as a dying declara tion. The defence assailed the credibility of the eye-witnesses as well as the authenticity of the dying declaration. The Sessions Judge accepted the prosecution ~ase
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Suresh Thipmppa Shetty v. The State of Maharashtra
- 2021 Kallu Khan v. State of Rajasthan
- 2018 Menoka Malik and Others v. The State of West Bengal and Others
- 2017 Machindra v. Sajjan Galfa Rankhamb & Ors.
- 2016 Yogesh Singh v. Mahabeer Singh & Ors.
- 2013 Hiraman v. State of Maharashtra
- 2019 Balvir Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2012 Kathi Bharat Vajsur & Anr. v. State of Gujarat
Of those, 6 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.