Supreme Court of India
Sheoratan Agarwal & Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Essential Commodities Act. 1955-Section JO-Interpretation of-Company contravening an order made under s.3-Whether the person in-charge or an officer of the company at the relevant period can be prosecuted separately without pro secuting the company. The two appellants, who were the Managing Director and the Production Manager of a public limited company, were prosecuted by the respondent for alleged violations by their company of clauses 2 (c) (i) and 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Pulses. Edible Oil Seeds and Edible Oil Dealers Licensing Order, 1977 and clause 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Essential
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Dhanasingh Prabhu v. Chandrasekar & Another
- 2022 Dilip Hariramani v. Bank of Baroda
- 2021 Dayle De’souza v. Government of India through Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (c) and Another
- 2026 Manjula Kapoor v. The State of Himachal Pradesh
- 2025 S.C. Garg v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- 1999 Anil Hada v. Indian Acrylic Limited
- 2012 Aneeta Hada v. M/s. Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd.
Of those, 3 referred to · 3 mentioned · 1 overruled
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.