Supreme Court of India
V. Sasidharan v. Peter & Karunakar & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the office of a lawyer or of a firm of lawyer is not a 'commercial establishment' within the meaning of the Act.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Shops & Establishments Act !960 (Kerela_ Act). Sec. 2(4)-Firm of Lawyers -Whether a commercial establishment. The appellant preferred an appeal to the App;!liate Authority under the Kerela Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960 (For short. !he .ct) against his dismissal from service by respondent No. 1, a firm of Lawyers. Respondent No. 1 raised a preliminary objection that the appeal was not main tainable since Respondent No. I firm was not a commercial establishment under .- the Act. The Appellate Authority upheld the preliminary objection and dismis sed the appeai. His writ
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.