Supreme Court of India
Mohan Lal v. Management of M/s Bharat Electronics Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the termination of service of the appellant was ab initio void and inoper ative and a declaration is made that he continues to be in service with all consequential benefits, namely, back wages in full and other benefits, if any.
Judgment, page 18
From the headnote
Retrenchment-Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Dispute Act-Whether termi nation of the services of a workman who has put in 240 working days within a period of one year amounts ro retrenchment and whether for non-compliance with the pro visions of section 25F the termination of service is ab initio void-Sections 25A and 25B, scope of-Effect of terminqtion of service which is ab initio void and inopera tive, explained. The appellant was employed with the respondent as Salesman at its Delhi Sales Depot on a salary of Rs. 520/- per month from 8th December, J 973. His service was abruptly
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 Mohd. Ali v. State of H.P. and Others
- 2013 Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (d.ed.) and Others
- 2011 Devinder Singh v. Municipal Council, Sanaur
Of those, 3 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.