Supreme Court of India
State of Karnataka v. Pratap Chand & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Dmgs and Cosmetics Act 194G-Section 18A-Scope of-Information furni shed under section 18A alleged to be fictitious-Report of Inspector not proved ln.rpector not examined- Validity of report. Section 34-"person incharge"-Meaning of-Tests to he applied. All the three respondent s (respondents nos. 1 and 2 partners and respondent No. 3, the firm) were prosecuted for the alleged · contravention of section I SA, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 in that when asked by the Drugs Inspector to disclose the name, address and other particulars of the person from whom a cer tain drug was acquired by them,
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Dayle De’souza v. Government of India through Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (c) and Another
- 2014 Pooja Ravinder Devidasani v. State of Maharashtra&anr.
- 2022 Dilip Hariramani v. Bank of Baroda
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.