Supreme Court of India

Deputy Commissioner, Sales Tax (law) Board of Revenue (taxes) Ernakulam v. Pio Food Packers

Neutral citation
Reported as [1980] 3 S.C.R. 1271
Decided 9 May 1980

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that when pineapple fruit is processed into pineapple slices for the purpose of being sold in sealed cans there is no consumption of the original pineapple fruit for the purpose of manufac­ ture.

Judgment, page 7

From the headnote

Kera/a General Sales Tax Act, Section 5- (l)(a) "conmmes such goods in the malrufacture of other goods for sale or otherwise", meaning of-ExigibiliJy to tax of pineapple ffuit. when processed into slices for the purpose of being IO!d in sealed cans. ·-..; Tho respondent assessee, Pio Food Packers carries on the business of manu­ . facturing and selling canned fruit besides other products. The Pineapple pur­ chased by the assessee is washed and then the inedible portion, tbe end crown, skin· and inner core are removed, thereafter the fruit is, sliced and the slices are filled in cans, sugar is

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.