Supreme Court of India
Hind Overseas Private Limited v. Raghunath Prasad Jhunjhunwalla and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Practice-Company cases-Winding up petitions-Duty of the company Co'urt . . English decisions--Usefulness of-Applicability to cases under the Com panies Act. Winding up of companies-The .ompanies Act (Act l), 1956-Sec. 433 (f) -Scope of vis-a-vis s. 44(g) of the Partnership Act. · ''Just and equitable c/ause"-App/icability in case of par//lership firms in • the guise of a private company. Under s. 433 (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, a company may be wound up by the Court, if the Court is of opinion that it i~ just and equitable that the company should be wound up. Section 44(g) of the
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Mrs. Shailja Krishna v. Satori Global Limited & Ors.
- 2011 Chatterjee Petrochem (i) Pvt. Ltd. v. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. & Ors.
- 2024 Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal
- 2015 Commercial Motors Ltd. v. Commissioner of Trade Tax U.P., Lucknow & Others
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.