Supreme Court of India
Noor Mohammad Mohd. Yusuf Momin v. State of Maharashtra
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Criminal law-Difference between conspiracy, comnion intention and abetment-lndian Penal Code, (Act 45 of 1860), ss. 34, 109 and 1208- Scope of. Four accused were charged with the offences under s. 120· (cons piracy to commit murder) and s. 302 read with s. 34. The fourth accused was also charged under s .. 302 read with s. 109 for the offence of abetting the murder committed by the other three accused. The accused 2 to 4 were related to one another while the first accused was a servant of the brother of the second accused. There were constant disputes between the fourth accused and the
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 Mukesh & Anr. v. State for Nct of Delhi & Ors.
- 2017 State of Karnataka v. Selvi J. Jayalalitha & Ors.
- 2026 Hem Raj v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- 2023 Suresh Thipmppa Shetty v. The State of Maharashtra
Of those, 2 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.