Supreme Court of India
The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Naim
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
High Court-Inherent power in criminal cases-Remarks in Judgment-Duty of Judge.-Expunging remarks-Power of High Court-State Government, if can apply-Cork of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act V of 1898), •· 561- . While disposing of a criminal appeal the High Court directed the issue of a notice to N, the investigating officer, to show cause why a •omplaint should not be instituted against him under s. 195, Indian Penal Code. N appeared and threw himself at the mercy of the Court and asked for forgiveneso. The High Court accepted the apology hesitatingly but made the following among other remarks
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 P. Radhakrishnan & Anr. v. Cochin Devaswom Board & Ors.
- 2024 Sonu Agnihotri v. Chandra Shekhar & Ors.
- 2011 Lanka Venkateswarlu (d) by Lrs. v. State of A.P. & Ors.
Of those, 3 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.