Supreme Court of India
Javer Chand and Others v. Pukhraj Surana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Document-Hundi-Inadequatcly stamped- Exhibited -Ad missibility-Objection when to be raised-Courts 1 if can revise or review order admitting document-M arwar Stamp Act, 1914, ss. 9 and II-Marwar Stamp Act, 1947, ss. 35 proviso (a), 36. The respondent admitted the execution of two Hundis in suit which were tendered and marked as exhibits but denied consideration and raised the plea that the "hundis exhibited were inadmissible in evidence as at the time the suit was filed in 1949 they had not been stamped according to the Stamp Law. When the hundis were executed in December, 1946, the Marwar
Where later benches applied it
- 2024 G.M. Shahul Hameed v. Jayanthi R. Hegde
- 2024 Bidyut Sarkar & Anr. v. Kanchilal Pal (dead) through Lrs. & Anr.
- 2023 In Re: Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and the Indian Stamp Act 1899 v..
- 2006 Shyamal Kumar Roy v. Sushil Kumar Agarwal
- 1978 Ram Rattan (dead) by Legal Representatives v. Bajrang Lal & Ors.
Of those, 1 referred to · 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.