Supreme Court of India
M/s. Murlidhar Chiranjilal v. M/s. Harishchandra Dwarkadas and Another
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Damages-Breach of contract-Sale of goods-Measure of damages-Foreseeable consequence of breach-Knowledge of parties -Indian Contract Act, r872 (9 of r872), s. 73. The appellant entered into a contract with the respondent for the sale of certain canvas at Re. I per yard under which the delivery was to be made through railway receipt for Calcutta f. o. r. Kanpur. The cost of transport from Kanpur to Calcutta and the Jabour charges in that connection were to be borne by the respondent and it was agreed that the railway receipt would be delivered on August 5, 1947. The appellant was unable to
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 American Metallurgical Coal Pty Ltd. v. Mmtc Ltd.
- 2023 H. J. Baker and Bros. Inc v. The Minerals and Metals Trade Corporation Ltd. (mmtc)
- 2021 M/s. Padia Timber Company (p) Ltd. v. The Board of Trustees of Visakhapatnam Port Trust through its Secretary
- 2017 Kanchan Udyog Limited v. United Spirits Limited
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.