Supreme Court of India
Yellappagouda Shankargouda Patil v. Basangouda Shiddangouda Patil
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result the petition is allowed and the decree in question in so far as it purports to operate on or include any right to the office of Patilki and watan lands attached thereto at Kirtgeri as enumerated in the certificate is cancelled.
Judgment, page 7
From the headnote
Hereditary Office-Decree for partition of Watan land upheld by Privy Council in appeal-Abolition of Privy Council's jurisdic tion-Issue of certificate by Collector-Application for cancella tion of decree, if can be entertained by the Supreme Court-Bombay Hereditary Offices Act, r874 (Bom. III of r874), s. IO-Abolition of Privy Council jurisdiction Act, r949 (V of I949), ss. 5, 8-Consti tion of India, Arts. 374(2), r35. T.he respondent brought a suit for partition against the peti tioner in respect of certain Watan lands. The trial court decreed - the suit but the High Court of Bombay
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.