Supreme Court of India
The State of Bombay v. S. L. Apte & Another
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Double Jeopardy-Rule-" Same offence" -Test-Constitution of India, Art. zo(z)-General Clauses Act, I897 (Io of I897), s. a6 -Indian Penal Code, I86o (XLV of I86o), s. 409-Insurance Act, I9J8 (IV of I938), s. w5. By Art. 20(2) of the Constitution "No person shall be prose cuted and punished for the same offence more than once." Section 26 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, provides, "Where an act or omission constitutes an offence under two or more enactments, then the offender shall be liable to be pro secuted and punished under either or any of those enactments, but shall not be liable to
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2017 State of Jharkhand through Sp, Cbi v. Lalu Prasad @ Lalu Prasad Y Aday
- 2010 The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Vimal Kumar Surana and Another
- 2010 Monica Bedi v. State of Ap.
Of those, 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.