Supreme Court of India
Babulal Parate v. The State of Bombay and Another
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that there was no viola tion of Art. 3 and the Act or any of its provisions are not invalid on that ground.
Judgment, page 12
From the headnote
States, Reorganisation of-Modification of Bill by Parliament Such modification, if must be ref erred to State Legislature-ConsU tution of India, Art. 3, proviso-States Reorganisation Act, z956, tXXXVII of z956), s. 8(z). Bill introduced in the House of the People on the report of the States Reorganisation Commission and as recommended by the President under the proviso to Art. 3 of the Constitution, contained a proposal for the formation of three separate units, viz., (1) Union territory of Bombay, (2) Maharashtra, including Marathawada and Vidarbha and (3) Gujrat, including Saurashtra ·and
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors.
- 2009 Pradeep Chaudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- 2023 In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution v..
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 followed · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.