Supreme Court of India
The State of Madras v. A. Vaidyanatha Iyer
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Appeal by special /eave-Order of acquittal by the High Court Power of Supreme Court-Presumption-Prevention of Corruption Act. (II of 1947), s. 4-Constitution of India, Art. 136. Respondent, an Income-tax Officer, called an assessee to his house and took a sum of Rs. 800 from him. Immediately after wards a search was made and the respondent, after some evasion produced the money. The respondent's defence was that he had taken the money as a loan and not as illegal gratification. The Special Judge who tried the respondent found him guilty under s. 161, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced him to
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Daivshala & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr
- 2019 Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar
- 2003 M.S. Madhusoodhanan and Anr. v. Kerala Kaumudi Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
- 1979 Arunachalam v. P. S. R. Sadhanantham
- 1971 Himachal Pradesh Administration v. Shri Om Prakash
Of those, 1 referred to · 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.