Supreme Court of India
The State of Bombay v. Ali Gulshan
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the reasons given above, the appeal is allowed and the order of Tendolkar J. is restored with costs payable to the appellant by the respondent throughout.
Judgment, Concluding paragraph, p. 871
From the headnote
Constitution of India—Article 31—Public purpose—Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 (Bombay Act XXXIII of 1948), s. 6(4)(a)—Requisition for a public purpose of certain premises by the State of Bombay—For 'housing a member of the staff of a foreign consulate'—Whether the requisition was made for a 'public purpose' within the meaning of the Act. Held, that the Government of Bombay was entitled, under clause (a) of sub-section (4) of s. 6 of the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 (Bombay Act XXXIII of 1948) to requisition as for a public purpose, certain premises for 'housing a member of the staff of a foreign consulate'.
Where later benches applied it
- 2008 Sooraram Pratap Reddy & Ors. v. District Collector, Ranga Reddy Distt. & Ors.
- 2015 K.B. Ramachandra Raje Urs (dead) by Lrs. v. State of Karnataka& Ors. Etc.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.