Supreme Court of India
Chilukuri Yenkateswarlu v. Chilukuri Venkatanarayana.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Indian Evidence Act (I of 1872), s. ll2-Pr1m1mp tion of law-Conclusive proof of leaitimacy-Birth rfarina lawful wedlock. The presumption under section 112 of the Indian vidence Act is a. conclusiv e presumption of law which ca.n be displaced only by non-access between the p:i.rties to the marriage a.t a time when according to the ordinary course of nature the husband could have been the father of the child. Access and non·a.ccess connote existence and non-existence of opportunities for marital intercou rse. Karap aya v. Ma11and11 (1), referred to. Non-access can be proved by evidence direct
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Ivan Rathinam v. Milan Joseph
- 2014 Dipanwita Roy v. Ronobroto Roy
- 2010 Bharatha Matha & Anr. v. R. Vijaya Renganathan & Ors.
- 2009 Shyam Lal @ Kuldeep v. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors
- 2001 Smt. Kanti Devi and Anr. v. Poshi Ram
- 1970 Perumal Nadar (dead) by L.rs. v. Ponnuswami
- 1969 Praduman Kumar v. Virendra Goyal (dead) by L. Rs.
Of those, 7 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.